In theory line 1 could be restored Flaui]us Ceriali[s and the fragment treated as a draft letter from Cerialis. We have decided against this interpretation, however, since the tops of the letters in the line below could well represent salutem, justified to the right and so not leaving room for a name after Ceriali[s in line
1. There does seem to be some ink before this, but this might come from suo; for suo in this position cf., e.g., 243.
Download EpiDoc version using the CC license and
EpiDoc Schema v.5